Understanding Multi-Agent Transfers

What "Successfully transferred..." means

When you see messages like:

Successfully transferred to system_info_worker
Successfully transferred back to supervisor

These are tool execution results from the LangGraph supervisor pattern. Here's what's happening:

🔄 The Transfer Flow

Supervisor receives user query: "Nginx returns 502 Bad Gateway on my server. What can I do?"
Supervisor analyzes and delegates: Based on the SUPERVISOR_PROMPT in config.py, it decides to start with system_info_worker
Transfer tool execution: Supervisor calls transfer_to_system_info_worker tool
- Result: "Successfully transferred to system_info_worker"
- Meaning: Control is now handed to the system_info_worker agent
Agent executes: The system_info_worker gets:
- Full conversation context (including the original user query)
- Its own specialized prompt from agents/system_agents.py
- Access to its tools (shell commands for system info)
Agent completes and returns: Agent calls transfer_back_to_supervisor
- Result: "Successfully transferred back to supervisor"
- Meaning: Agent finished its task and returned control
- Important: Agent's results are now part of the conversation history
Supervisor decides next step: Based on accumulated results, supervisor either:
- Delegates to another agent (e.g., service_inventory_worker)
- Provides final response to user
- Key: Supervisor can see ALL previous agent results when making decisions

🧠 How Prompts Work

Supervisor Prompt (config.py)

SUPERVISOR_PROMPT = """
You are the supervisor of a team of specialised sysadmin agents.
Decide which agent to delegate to based on the user's query **or** on results already collected.
Available agents:
- system_info_worker: gather system metrics
- service_inventory_worker: list running services  
- mariadb_analyzer: analyse MariaDB
...
Always start with `system_info_worker` and `service_inventory_worker` before drilling into a specific service.
"""

Agent Prompts (agents/*.py)

Each agent has its own specialized prompt, for example:

# system_info_worker prompt
"""
You are a Linux sysadmin. Use shell commands like `lscpu`, `free -h`, and `df -h` to gather CPU, RAM, and disk usage. 
Return a concise plain‑text summary. Only run safe, read‑only commands.
"""

🎯 What Each Agent Receives

When an agent is activated via transfer:

Full conversation history: All previous messages between user, supervisor, and other agents
Specialized prompt: Guides how the agent should interpret and act on the conversation
Tools: Shell access, specific analyzers, etc.
Context: Results from previous agents in the conversation

🔄 How Agent Results Flow Back to Supervisor

This is the key mechanism that makes the multi-agent system intelligent:

Agent produces results: Each agent generates an AIMessage with its findings/analysis
Results become part of conversation: The agent's response is added to the shared message history
Supervisor sees everything: When control returns to supervisor, it has access to:
- Original user query
- All previous agent responses
- Tool execution results
- Complete conversation context
Supervisor strategy updates: Based on accumulated knowledge, supervisor can:
- Decide which agent to call next
- Skip unnecessary agents if enough info is gathered
- Synthesize results from multiple agents
- Provide final comprehensive response

Example Flow:

User: "Nginx 502 error, help!"
├── Supervisor → system_info_worker
│   └── Returns: "502 usually means upstream server issues, check logs..."
├── Supervisor (now knows about upstream issues) → service_inventory_worker  
│   └── Returns: "Check PHP-FPM status, verify upstream config..."
└── Supervisor (has both perspectives) → Final synthesis
    └── "Based on system analysis and service inventory, here's comprehensive solution..."

🔍 Enhanced Debugging

The updated utils.py now shows:

Transfer explanations: What each "Successfully transferred" means
Conversation context: Last few messages to understand the flow
Tool call details: What tools are being used and why
Agent delegation: Which agent is being called and for what purpose

🔍 Observing Result Flow in Practice

To see how results flow back to the supervisor, run the enhanced debugging and watch for:

Agent Results: Look for AIMessage from agents (not just transfer confirmations)
Conversation Context: The expanding message history in each step
Supervisor Decision Changes: How supervisor's next choice is influenced by results

Example Debug Output Analysis:

🔄 STEP 2: system_info_worker
💬 MESSAGE TYPE: AIMessage  ← AGENT'S ACTUAL RESULT
📄 CONTENT: "502 typically indicates upstream server issues..."

🔄 STEP 4: service_inventory_worker  
💬 MESSAGE TYPE: AIMessage  ← AGENT'S ACTUAL RESULT
📄 CONTENT: "Check PHP-FPM status, verify upstream config..."

🔄 STEP 5: supervisor
💬 MESSAGE TYPE: AIMessage  ← SUPERVISOR'S SYNTHESIS
📄 CONTENT: "Based on system analysis and service inventory..."
📚 CONVERSATION CONTEXT (12 messages)  ← SUPERVISOR SEES ALL RESULTS

The supervisor's final response demonstrates it has processed and synthesized results from both agents!

📋 Key Takeaways

"Successfully transferred" = Control handoff confirmation, not data transfer
Each agent gets the full conversation context INCLUDING previous agent results
Agent prompts determine how they process that context
Supervisor orchestrates the workflow based on its prompt strategy
The conversation builds up context as each agent contributes their expertise
Results accumulate: Each agent can see and build upon previous agents' work
Supervisor learns: Strategy updates based on what agents discover
Dynamic workflow: Supervisor can skip agents or change direction based on results

6.1 KiB Raw Blame History Unescape Escape